RothIRAHub is curated by an independent researcher — the Curator — working directly from IRS primary material (publications, forms, instructions, and notices). To add a second set of eyes on the tax-technical mechanics, we’re building a paid program under which credentialed tax professionals (CPA, EA, or tax attorney) review individual pillar articles and are publicly attributed as the reviewer of record once they sign off.
The program is rolling out article by article. Pieces that have completed technical review display the reviewer’s name, firm, and credentials at the bottom of the article; pieces that haven’t yet display no reviewer, because none has been engaged yet. We don’t list reviewers we haven’t actually worked with.
Reviewer Roster
Being built article by article
No articles have completed technical review yet. As reviewers are engaged and pillar articles sign off, their name, firm, and credentials will appear on the reviewed article and be listed here.
Rather than publish placeholder profiles or stock faces, this page will stay honest about where the program actually is.
How technical review works
Technical review is a paid engagement with a credentialed tax professional. The scope is narrow on purpose: the reviewer is checking the tax-technical claims in a single article against IRS primary sources, not certifying the article as personal advice to any reader.
- Engagement. We sign an engagement letter with the reviewer that defines scope, fee, attribution terms, and confidentiality. Reviewers are paid for their time.
- Technical review. The reviewer reads the article against the cited IRS publications, code sections, and regulations, and sends back comments — corrections, missing edge cases, or anything that needs to be softened or cited differently.
- Revisions and sign-off. The author revises. If the reviewer is satisfied that the tax-technical content is accurate as of the review date, they sign off in writing.
- Public attribution. Only after sign-off do we publish the reviewer’s name, firm, credentials, and a link on the article and on this page.
Review reflects the law as of a specific date and the tax-technical content of a specific article. It isn’t ongoing certification of the site, and it isn’t advice to any individual reader. For your own situation, talk to your own tax professional.
Interested in reviewing?
If you’re a licensed CPA, Enrolled Agent, or tax attorney and you’d like to be engaged as a reviewer on a pillar article, we’d welcome the conversation. Reach out via the contact page with your credentials and any areas of focus. Reviewers are paid and publicly attributed.