Why time beats the amount

A dollar invested at 25 has many more years to double than a dollar invested at 45. That is why the contributions you make earliest do the most work — they compound for the longest. Two people who contribute the exact same total over their lives can retire with very different balances based purely on who started first. The calculator above turns that abstract idea into a dollar figure.

How the math works

Each scenario assumes you contribute the same amount at the end of every year until your retirement age, growing at the return you set. The “start now” balance runs for the full stretch; the “wait” balance runs for fewer years and its dollars have less time to compound. The difference between the two is the cost of the delay. Everything else is held equal — same contribution, same return — so the only thing being measured is time.

Real returns vary year to year, fees and taxes differ by account, and the IRS contribution limit rises over time. Treat the result as an illustration of the shape of the tradeoff, not a prediction of your actual balance.

Want a full projection instead?

This tool deliberately changes only one thing — when you start. To model changing contributions, age-50 catch-ups, market volatility, and inflation, use the Roth IRA Growth Projector, which runs a full multi-decade projection with percentile bands. Think of this page as the “cost of waiting” companion to that calculator.

This is an educational illustration, not tax, legal, or investment advice. Your actual results depend on your investments, fees, contribution amounts, and market returns. Confirm any decision with your own financial or tax professional.