The Roth IRA in Florida: No State Tax, the Best Creditor Protection in the Country, and How to Prove You Left

Florida does not tax Roth IRA withdrawals, Roth conversions, or anything else about your retirement accounts — the state constitution forbids a personal income tax, and no Florida county or city may levy one either. A $100,000 conversion that costs a New York City resident roughly $11,949 costs a Floridian $0 in state tax. But the more interesting answers here aren’t about tax at all: Florida shields your Roth from creditors with no dollar cap, protects an inherited Roth by statute where most states leave it to the courts, and asks nothing of you except that you genuinely become a Floridian — which the state you left will contest.

What “no income tax” actually means here

Most states answer the Roth tax question with a rate schedule. Florida answers it with its constitution: Art. VII §5(a) caps any personal income tax on natural persons at zero, so introducing one would require a constitutional amendment ratified by voters — not a bill through the legislature. That makes the answer structural rather than a snapshot of this year’s rates. What follows from it:

• Conversions are free at the state level, in any amount, at any age. There is no exclusion to qualify for because there is nothing to exclude from — the opposite of New York, where the planning game is fitting conversions into a $20,000 annual window at 59½.
• No state early-withdrawal penalty. Only the federal 10% applies. California, by contrast, adds 2.5% of its own.
• No state withholding, no state estimated tax, no state safe harbor. A December conversion creates no state-level underpayment problem, because there is no state return.
• No local layer anywhere. No county, municipality, or special district may tax personal income.
• The Roth-vs-traditional comparison loses its state dimension entirely. There’s no state deduction to give up on a traditional contribution and no state tax to avoid on a Roth withdrawal — state tax simply drops out of both sides of the arithmetic.

Authority: Fla. Const. Art. VII §1(a); Fla. Const. Art. VII §5(a) ("or under its authority"); Fla. Stat. §166.201; 2025 Florida Tax Handbook (EDR), Local Government Revenue Sources · Fla. Const. Art. VII §5(a); 2025 Florida Tax Handbook (EDR) at 333; Fla. Stat. Ch. 220 (corporate only) · Fla. Const. Art. VII §5(a); Fla. Const. Art. XI §1, §5(e); 2025 Florida Tax Handbook (EDR) at 333 · Fla. Const. Art. VII §5(a); Fla. DOR GT-800025 (R. 08/25); Fla. DOR Taxes and Fees list; IRC §408A(d)(3)(A)(i) · Fla. Const. Art. VII §5(a); Fla. DOR GT-800025 (R. 08/25); · verified 2026-07-24

The part no tax table shows: Florida’s creditor shield

This is the strongest answer on the page, and it has nothing to do with taxes. Fla. Stat. §222.21(2)(a) exempts money in a qualifying retirement account “from all claims of creditors” — and Roth IRAs are named expressly, by their Internal Revenue Code section (§408A), not swept in by implication. There is no dollar cap and no means test anywhere in the statute.

That comparison matters more than it sounds. California protects an IRA only to the extent a judge finds it “necessary to provide for the support” of the debtor — a test a young, high-earning defendant can fail. Florida asks no such question.

And then the unusual part. Most states leave the inherited-IRA question to their courts, which is why it’s a coin flip in much of the country: the Supreme Court held in Clark v. Rameker (2014) that an inherited IRA isn’t a “retirement fund” for the federal bankruptcy exemption, and state law has had to fill the gap. Florida filled it in the statute. §222.21(2)(c) provides that an exempt account does not cease to be exempt after the owner’s death by reason of a transfer or rollover into an inherited IRA — and it reaches accounts inherited before the 2011 amendment as well. Before that amendment, Florida law ran the other way (Robertson v. Deeb), which is exactly why the Legislature acted.

Same account, three states

Every row sourced on its state’s own page · verified 2026-07-24

	New York	California	Florida
Taxes a Roth conversion?	Yes, minus a $20,000/yr window at 59½	Yes — in full, no exclusion at any age	No — constitutionally barred
Its own early-withdrawal penalty?	None	2.5% on top of the federal 10%	None
Local income tax?	NYC up to 3.876%; Yonkers surcharge	None (banned statewide)	None (banned statewide)
Your own Roth vs. creditors	Strong — named in CPLR §5205(c)	Weak — means-tested “as necessary for support”	Unlimited — no cap, no means test
An inherited Roth vs. creditors	Courts split — no resolution	Unsettled — no controlling authority	Protected by statute
State estate tax?	Yes — $7.35M with a 105% cliff	None	None
$100,000 conversion costs	~$11,949 (NYC resident)	~$9,300	$0

The limits are real and worth stating plainly. An IRS levy overrides the exemption entirely (IRC §6334(c)) — state exemptions don’t bind federal tax collection. The statute’s own carve-outs let a QDRO alternate payee and a surviving spouse’s elective share reach the account. Contributions made with intent to hinder or defraud a creditor remain voidable under §726.105 and §222.30, even though Florida imposes no contribution-timing lookback. And the homestead exemption that Florida is equally famous for — unlimited in value, capped only by acreage under Art. X §4 — carries its own federal bankruptcy limit of $214,000 on equity acquired within 1,215 days of filing.

At death, the state takes nothing: no estate tax (none since 2004, and Art. VII §5 caps any future one at the long-dead federal credit), no inheritance tax, no gift tax. Only the federal estate tax applies, with a $15,000,000 exclusion for 2026 — and your Roth is includible in that gross estate at full value even though it’s income-tax-free to your heirs.

Authority: Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014) (No. 13-299), Syllabus & n.1; 11 U.S.C. §522(b)(3)(A) · Fla. Const. Art. X §4(a)–(c) · Fla. Dept. of Revenue, Florida Estate Tax (citing Ch. 198, Fla. Stat.); TIP #23C03-01 · Fla. Stat. §222.21(2)(a)–(b) (2025) · Fla. Stat. §222.21(2)(c) (2025), as added by Ch. 2011-84, §1 (HB 469), eff. 5/31/2011 · Fla. Stat. §222.21(2)(c) (last sentence) and §222.21(2)(e) (2025) · Fla. Stat. §222.21(2)(d) (2025) · Fla. Stat. §732.2035(8); §732.2065 (30%); §732.201; §732.2045(1)(c) (spousal-consen · verified 2026-07-24

The hard part: proving you actually left

Nobody needs convincing that Florida won’t tax them. The real question is whether the state they left agrees they’re gone — because 4 U.S.C. §114 only protects a nonresident. Get that wrong and a conversion you thought was free is fully taxable by the old state.

Florida’s signature instrument is the declaration of domicile under §222.17 — a sworn statement filed with your circuit court clerk. It helps, and you should understand exactly what it is: evidence of a domicile you have already established, not a shield. Both New York’s audit manual and California’s Franchise Tax Board publish the same conclusion — a Florida declaration standing alone does not end their claim. Florida itself lists ten evidentiary factors in §196.015, and the homestead exemption is among the strongest, precisely because claiming it requires Florida to be your permanent residence in good faith.

What actually defeats people is arithmetic in the old state:

• New York: keep a permanent place of abode and spend more than 183 days in-state — any part of a day counts — and you’re a statutory resident no matter where your heart is. The burden of proving departure is yours, by clear and convincing evidence. And the much-discussed 548-day rule is no help for a Florida move: it requires days in a foreign country.
• California: a two-prong domicile test plus a closest-connections analysis, more than nine months in-state creating a presumption of residency, and a dedicated residency-audit program with a published manual.
• Either way, conversion timing is all-or-nothing. Both states include the entire conversion if you were a resident when you received it. There is no proration. Convert after the move is genuinely complete, not during it.

One asset-protection trap hides in the same move. In bankruptcy, federal law applies the exemptions of wherever you were domiciled for the 730 days before filing (11 U.S.C. §522(b)(3)(A)). Move from California in March, file in June, and you get California’s means-tested IRA exemption — not Florida’s unlimited one. Florida’s protection is excellent; it just isn’t instant.

Authority: 11 U.S.C. §522(b)(3)(A) · 4 U.S.C. §114(a) (P.L. 104-95, 109 Stat. 979) · Cal. R&TC §17014(a), §17016; CCR §17016; FTB Residency and Sourcing Technical Manual (Rev. 01/2026) §2400; FTB Pub. 1031 (2025) §§G-H · FTB Pub. 1031 (2025), Guidelines for Determining Resident Status, §H, Example 3 · Fla. Stat. §196.015 (2025) · Fla. Stat. §222.17(1) (2025); mechanics at §222.17(2)-(6) · Fla. Stat. §222.17(1), (7) (2025) · NY TSB-M-98(7)I at 2-3; Cal. R&TC §17041(a)-(d); FTB Pub. 1100 (2025) §B · NY Tax Law §605(b)(1 · verified 2026-07-24

The hurricane rule nobody connects to a Roth IRA

Florida is the most hurricane-exposed state in the country, and there is a standing federal rule aimed at exactly that situation — but it’s almost never discussed alongside Roth accounts. Under SECURE 2.0 §331, a qualified disaster recovery distribution of up to $22,000 per federally declared major disaster:

• Escapes the 10% early-distribution penalty entirely, regardless of how the custodian codes the 1099-R.
• Spreads over three years for income-tax purposes by default, with an election to take it all in year one.
• Can be repaid within three years, treated as a trustee-to-trustee rollover — effectively an interest-free loan from your own retirement account.
• Requires no proof of loss amount. There is no need test.
• Is permanent law, keyed to any major disaster declared after December 27, 2020 — no special act of Congress needed per storm.

A Roth IRA is an eligible plan for this. The honest nuance: the relief operates on the part of a Roth that could actually be taxed or penalized — the earnings — because your own contributions already come out tax- and penalty-free under the ordering rules whether a hurricane hit or not. Separately, IRS disaster postponements under §7508A extend not just filing deadlines but the deadline to make an IRA or Roth IRA contribution.

Authority: IRC §7508A; IRS Pub 590-B (2025), "Mandatory 60-Day Postponement" · IRS Pub 590-B (2025), "Economic loss" · IRS Pub 590-B (2025), "Eligible retirement plan" (Disaster-Related Relief) · IRS Pub 590-B (2025), "Repayment of Qualified Disaster Recovery Distributions" · IRS Pub 590-B (2025), "Taxation of Qualified Disaster Recovery Distributions" · SECURE 2.0 Act §331; IRC §72(t)(11); IRS Disaster Relief FAQs (SECURE 2.0) · SECURE 2.0 Act §331; IRC §72(t)(11); IRS Pub 590-B (2025), Ch. 3 Disaster-Related Relief · verified 2026-07-24

Where a conversion still costs you something in Florida

With no income tax, Florida’s benefit cliffs are property-tax and Medicaid based — and one of them contains the most elegant Roth distinction on this page.

The 65+ homestead exemption is income-tested at $38,686 for 2026, and “household income” means federal adjusted gross income under IRC §62, counted for every member of the household. So:

• A Roth conversion counts — conversion income lands squarely in AGI and can push a senior over the line.
• A qualified Roth withdrawal doesn’t count at all — it never enters gross income, so it never reaches AGI. An equivalent traditional-IRA withdrawal does. Same money, same year, opposite effect on the exemption.
• The penalty for getting this wrong is disproportionate: failing to report income over the limit can bring a 10-year lookback tax lien plus interest and a penalty.
• The standard homestead exemption, Save Our Homes, and the veteran exemptions have no income test — a conversion cannot touch those. The homestead tax deferral and the disability exemption do have income tests, and the disability one uses a broader “gross income” definition.

Medicaid is the harder cliff. Florida is an income-cap state: the 2026 nursing-home (ICP) limit is $2,982 of gross monthly income against a $2,000 asset limit, and above the cap Florida requires a qualified income trust — a Miller trust — rather than simply reducing your benefit. Eligibility counts income “from any source unless specifically excluded,” so a Roth distribution’s federal tax-free status earns nothing here.

And one question is genuinely unsettled, which we’d rather say than paper over: Florida’s manual excludes retirement funds in “payout status” from countable assets, but that exclusion is written for work-related funds and pensions, leaving a self-established IRA in an unclear position. For Roth owners it’s murkier still — payout status turns on receiving regular payments, and a Roth has no required distributions at all. The word “Roth” does not appear anywhere in the relevant chapter of the state’s policy manual. Anyone planning around this needs a Florida elder-law attorney, not a web page.

Authority: Fla. DCF ESS Policy Manual Appendix A-9, "SSI-Related Medicaid Coverage Groups Financial Eligibility Standards: January 2026"; ESS Policy Manual §1840.0110 · Fla. DCF ESS Policy Manual §1840.0110 (Income Trusts), §1640.0576.08, Appendix A-22.1; 42 U.S.C. §1396p(d)(4)(B) · Fla. Stat. §196.031(1)(a), (3), (4) (2025); Fla. Const. Art. VII §6(a) · Fla. Stat. §196.075(1)(a)-(b), (5) (2025); IRC §62; IRC §408A(d)(1) (qualified distributions excluded from gross income); IRC §408A(d)(3) (conversions includible) · Fla. Stat. §196.075(2), (3), (4)(b · verified 2026-07-24

The public-employee corner — and the missing auto-IRA

Florida runs no state auto-IRA program. The 2026 bills (SB 930 / HB 1357) would only have created a task force to study one, and both died in committee in March 2026 — so unlike California’s CalSavers or New York’s Secure Choice, no Floridian is being auto-enrolled into a Roth IRA, and the excess-contribution trap those programs create simply doesn’t exist here. Florida law also bars cities and counties from requiring private employers to provide retirement benefits.

For public workers, Roth access is uneven and worth checking rather than assuming:

• State employees: the State of Florida Deferred Compensation Plan (457(b)) offers a Roth option.
• The FRS Investment Plan is not a Roth and cannot accept Roth IRA rollovers — a common misunderstanding among state hires choosing between the Pension and Investment Plans.
• The State University System ORP plan document expressly refuses Roth rollovers; a university employee’s Roth route is a separate voluntary 403(b), and availability is plan-by-plan.
• Counties do offer it — Miami-Dade’s 457, for instance.
• Since January 1, 2026, high earners in these plans must make catch-up contributions as Roth contributions — a federal rule now live in Florida public plans.
• The tax simplification: because Florida exempts no retirement income, there is no state-level puzzle about which plan’s distributions get which exclusion. New York spends a whole section on that distinction; here it evaporates.

Authority: Fla. Dept. of Revenue, GT-800025 (R. 08/25) · Fla. Senate Commerce & Tourism staff analysis, SB 930 (Jan. 12, 2026); SB 930 (2026) status "Died in Governmental Oversight and Accountability on 3/13/2026"; HB 1357 (2026) · Fla. Stat. §218.077(1)(d), (1)(f), (2), (3)(a) (2025); as amended by s. 2, ch. 2024-80, eff. 9/30/2026 · Florida Dept. of Financial Services, Bureau of Deferred Compensation, Plan Brochure (rev. 032025); IRC §457(b); SECURE 2.0 §325 · Florida State University System Optional Retirement Program Plan Document (frs.fl.gov); IRC §402A(e)(1); IRC §408A · verified 2026-07-24

Four Florida beliefs you can retire

A state with no income tax attracts a particular kind of folklore. Each of these is wrong:

• verified“Florida taxes intangibles like stocks and bonds” — wrong twice over. The annual intangible personal property tax was repealed by Ch. 2006-312, effective 2007. And even before repeal it never touched retirement accounts: Fla. Stat. §199.185(1)(e) expressly exempted IRC §408 and §408A accounts. The tax is gone, and it was never yours to pay.
• verified“Florida could add an income tax any time” — not by ordinary legislation. Art. VII §5(a) of the Florida Constitution caps a personal income tax at zero. Changing that requires a constitutional amendment ratified by voters, not a bill. That’s why the answer on this page is structural rather than a snapshot of this year’s rates.
• verified“My old state can still tax my IRA for years after I leave” — federal law says no. 4 U.S.C. §114 bars any state from taxing the retirement income of a nonresident, and §114(b)(1)(E) names individual retirement plans explicitly. New York’s own department confirms it covers Roth conversion income. The genuine fight is never the rule — it’s whether you truly stopped being a resident.
• verified“I filed a declaration of domicile, so I’m done” — it’s evidence, not a shield. Fla. Stat. §222.17 lets you swear to your Florida domicile, and it helps. But New York’s audit manual cites taxpayers who filed one and were still held New York residents, and California’s FTB publishes the same conclusion. A declaration proves intent; day counts and a retained home prove the opposite.

The fine print that actually bites

Everything below comes from statutes, official instructions, and program documents surfaced during verification:

• priority_highMoving to Florida for asset protection doesn’t work for two years in bankruptcy. Federal law picks your exemption state by where you were domiciled for the 730 days before filing (11 U.S.C. §522(b)(3)(A)). Move from California in March and file bankruptcy in June and you get California’s means-tested IRA exemption, not Florida’s unlimited one. The protection is real; the residency clock is too.
• priority_highThe 30% elective share reaches your Roth. Florida is not a community-property state, but a surviving spouse’s elective share is 30% of the elective estate — and Fla. Stat. §732.2035(8) puts retirement-account death benefits in that estate. Naming someone other than your spouse on the beneficiary form does not remove the account from the calculation.
• priority_highYour conversion can cost a Florida senior their property-tax exemption. The additional 65+ homestead exemption is capped at $38,686 of household income for 2026, and “household income” means federal adjusted gross income under IRC §62 for everyone living there. A Roth conversion lands squarely in AGI. Fail to report crossing the line and the county can place a tax lien reaching back 10 years, plus interest and a penalty.
• priority_highA qualified Roth withdrawal, by contrast, is invisible to that test. Because the limit keys on AGI and a qualified Roth distribution never enters gross income, the withdrawal doesn’t count — while an equivalent traditional-IRA withdrawal does. Same money, same year, different effect on the exemption.
• priority_highMedicaid does not care that Roth withdrawals are tax-free. Florida is an income-cap state: the 2026 nursing-home (ICP) limit is $2,982 of gross monthly income, with a $2,000 asset limit, and above the cap Florida requires a qualified income trust. The eligibility rules count income “from any source unless specifically excluded” — federal tax-free status buys nothing here.
• priority_highWhether your IRA counts as a Medicaid asset is genuinely unsettled. Florida’s manual excludes retirement funds in “payout status” from countable assets, but that exclusion is written for work-related funds and pensions, which leaves a self-established IRA in an unclear position. Worse for Roth owners: payout status turns on receiving regular payments, and a Roth has no required distributions at all. Published Florida guidance does not address it — the word “Roth” appears nowhere in the relevant chapter.
• priority_highAn IRS levy goes through Florida’s exemption like it isn’t there. IRC §6334(c) preempts state exemptions for federal tax collection. Florida’s uncapped protection stops private judgment creditors — not the federal government — and the statute’s own carve-outs also let a QDRO alternate payee and a surviving spouse’s elective share reach the account.
• priority_highFunding the account to dodge a creditor you already know about is voidable. There is no contribution-timing lookback in Florida’s IRA exemption — but the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (§726.105) and Florida’s own §222.30 still reach transfers made with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud. The exemption protects retirement saving, not asset-shuffling on the eve of a judgment.

Methodology & update log

This page is built from a 137-fact dataset researched exclusively from primary sources — the Florida Constitution, Florida Statutes, Department of Revenue property-tax publications, the Department of Children and Families policy manual, the U.S. Code, and official plan documents. An independent adversarial pass then re-fetched every cited source, checked each quote verbatim, hunted for superseding guidance, and re-derived the arithmetic: 113 of 137 facts confirmed, and the 24 corrections caught a repeated bad statutory citation, a misread form instruction, a plan document that contradicted a claim made from that same document, an amendment taking effect in September 2026 that will retire one of our own observations, and a comparison figure that turned out to be wrong on another page of this site — which we are correcting. Where Florida publishes nothing, this page says so rather than guessing; three questions are labeled unsettled on purpose.

• 2026-07-24 — page published; all 137 facts verified this date. Watch-list: the November 2026 ballot measure proposing a $250,000 non-school homestead exemption (a proposal, not law); the §218.077 amendment effective September 30, 2026; annual indexing of the 65+ exemption limit and the Medicaid figures; and any Florida movement on a state retirement-savings program after the 2026 bills died.

Spot an error? Tell us — corrections are logged in the changelog.

Florida Roth questions, answered plainly

Where to go next